Early Music America Summer 2014 - (Page 30)
By Michael Tsalka
UNDERESTIMATING
THE KEYBOARD SONATAS OF DANIEL GOTTLOB TÜRK ARE
A WINDOW INTO THE STYLES OF MOZART, HAYDN, AND BEETHOVEN
T PRESENT,
Daniel Gottlob Türk
(1750-1813) is best known for his
extensive pedagogical treatise, Klavierschule (1789), one of the main sources
for performance practice from the late
18th century. By contrast, our conception of Türk as a composer is quite
limited, based mostly on his 120 pedagogical Klavierstücke and, to a lesser
extent, on his Thirty Pieces for FourHands. Yet these keyboard compositions,
published at different points during the
last century to reinforce the historical
image of Türk as a pedagogue and
theorist, are neither his best nor his most
interesting works. Our superficial
knowledge of Türk's creative output,
particularly his 48 keyboard sonatas (of
which only four were republished in the
20th century), not only distorts our
understanding of his talents as a composer but also the exact nature of his
famed musical treatise.
The relative ignorance of Türk in
contemporary dialogue also stands in
marked contrast with the popularity of
these works during his lifetime and
shortly thereafter. In recent years, I have
edited (together with Dr. Angelica
Minero Escobar) and recorded 30 of
Türk's sonatas. This fascinating journey
of discovery has led me to conclude that
these compositions, much like the
keyboard works of other little-known
Classical masters such as Johann Baptist
Wanhal (1739-1813) and Ernst Wilhelm
Wolf (1735-1792), have been historically
overshadowed by those of Mozart and
Haydn.
Inarguably, a prejudice persists in
mainstream performance circles against
the presentation of obscure repertoire. It
is often presumed that if a composition
A
30
Summer 2014 Early Music America
construct. Working on unknown keyboard sonatas from the Classical period
can serve the modern performer in deepening his or her understanding of the
stylistic conventions and musical language of the era; in turn, this will assist
in creating more informed and personal
interpretations of the keyboard works of
Mozart, Haydn, and Beethoven.
Türk's extensive musical training,
which he received in Dresden from Gottfried August Homilius, a former student
of Johann Sebastian Bach, prepared him
early on for the varied musical roles he
fulfilled throughout his professional life.
When he became a student at the University of Leipzig in the early 1770s, the
keyboard virtuoso, Johann Wilhelm
Hässler, introduced him to C.P.E. Bach's
Versuch über die wahre Art das Klavier zu
spielen (1753), as well as to his keyboard
sonatas. Shortly afterwards, Türk, under
the supervision of his mentor and friend
Johann Adam Hiller, composed his first
two collections of sonatas. These 12
works were initially published by Breitkopf in Leipzig and Halle in 1776 and
1777. Because of their popularity, the
two collections quickly went out of
print.
After Türk began a long and fruitful
When compared to the grand
career as director of music at the Universonatas conceived for the
sity of Halle, five more volumes of his
fortepiano and concert hall by sonatas, intended for students and amaBeethoven and Clementi,
teurs, two labeled leichte and three
Türk's affective musical gestures labeled kleine, were released by Breitkopf
from 1783 to 1793. The Klaviersonaten,
appear limited to modern
Größtenteils für Kenner (1789), was the
listeners, but within the
only collection Türk specifically dedicataesthetic context of the 1770s ed to professional players.
and 1780s, his musical
Türk's keyboard collections grew
vocabulary is both varied
directly from his understanding of the
contrasting, expressive potential of the
and eloquent.
is not performed regularly, there must be
a plethora of justifiable reasons for its
exclusion from the standard repertoire.
More often than not, the work is
assumed to be mediocre. While these
assumptions may often be true, it is the
duty of performers and scholars to systematically investigate the work before
making such pronouncements. The value of a composition should be determined by its musical interest, not by its
lack of inclusion within a given historical
Table of Contents for the Digital Edition of Early Music America Summer 2014
Editor's Note
Reader Forum
Sound Bytes
Musings: The Force of Opinion
Recording Reviews
Baroque Opera and Historical Performance: A Reconsideration
Underestimating Turk
Our Disappearing LP Legacy
Living and Breathing Early Music, the Ukrainian Way
Ars Longa and the Festival Esteban Salas
Book Reviews
Ad Index
In Conclusion: The Flauto Dolce Heralds a Welcome Entrance into Heaven
Early Music America Summer 2014
http://www.brightcopy.net/allen/EMAM/22-1
http://www.brightcopy.net/allen/EMAM/21-4
http://www.brightcopy.net/allen/EMAM/21-3
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/EMAM/21-2
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/EMAM/21-1
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/EMAM/20-4
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/EMAM/20-3
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/EMAM/20-2
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/EMAM/20-1
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/EMAM/19-4
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/EMAM/19-3
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/EMAM/19-2
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/EMAM/19-1
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/EMAM/18-4
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/EMAM/18-3
https://www.nxtbookmedia.com