Journal of Oral Implantology February 2013 - (Page 110)
CASE REPORT
A Technique for Constructing a New Maxillary
Overdenture to a Nonretrievable Implant
Connecting Bar
Bulent Uludag, DDS, PhD1*
Serdar Polat, DDS1
Volkan Sahin, DDS, PhD2
Gurkan Goktug, DDS3
The most frequent mechanical complications of the bar-implant-retained overdentures are loosening of the bar
screws and the need to reactivate the retentive clips. This article describes a technique to construct a new
maxillary overdenture to a nonretrievable round-profile implant connecting bar with 2 distally placed
attachments. The retainer round-profile bar was nonretrievable due to a worn retaining screw head. Attachment
transfer analogs are used to transfer the position of the attachments to the master cast. The technique allows
the clinician to construct new overdentures without the need for removal of the implant connecting bar.
Reduced chairside time, reduced treatment cost, and increased patient satisfaction are the major advantages of
the technique.
Key Words: maxillary bar-implant-retained overdenture, attachments
INTRODUCTION
T
he use of dental implants for prosthetic
rehabilitation of an edentulous jaw is a
predictable and successful treatment
modality.1–3 With the advent of predictable implant support and retention, the
implant-supported overdenture (IOD) has become
an accepted treatment modality.4 A common form
of this treatment modality is the use of an implantretained bar to support an overdenture. This form
of treatment is associated with a high patient
acceptance rate because of increased denture
retention and stability, increased biting efficiency,
and improved quality of life.1,5,6 However, this form
1
Department of Prosthodontics, Ankara University, Faculty of
Dentistry, Ankara, Turkey.
2
Kırıkkale University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of
Prosthodontics, Kırıkkale, Turkey.
3
Boston University, Goldman School of Dental Medicine,
Department of Prosthodontics, Boston, Mass.
* Corresponding author, e-mail: bculudag@gmail.com
DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00042
110
Vol. XXXIX /No. One /2013
of treatment has disadvantages and complications,
such as prosthesis fracture, the extra bulk caused by
the presence of the metal bar, and the need for
frequent maintenance.7–9 In addition, lower success
rates are reported for the maxilla, especially for the
IOD treatment modality.8,10–15 In general, poor
bone quality and bone volume, short implant
length, and poor initial stability are factors associated with the lower success rate for implants in the
maxilla compared with the mandible.16–18 Compared with fixed prostheses or mandibular overdentures, IODs in the maxilla require a considerable
degree of postinsertion prosthetic maintenance.14,19
Most mechanical complications were found to
occur soon after denture insertion and were easily
resolved.8,15 Kiener et al20 reported the effectiveness of maxillary IODs. During an average period of
3.2 years, the most frequent mechanical complications were loosening of the bar screws and the
need to reactivate the retentive clips; during the
first year, mucosal irritation and the need for
Table of Contents for the Digital Edition of Journal of Oral Implantology February 2013
Could the Fountain of Youth Be All in Your Bones?
Vertical Bone Augmentation With Simultaneous Implant Placement Using Particulate
Evaluation of the Bone Healing Process Utilizing Platelet-Rich Plasma Activated by Thrombin
Effect of Model Parameters on Finite Element Analysis of Micromotions in Implant Dentistry
Peri-Implant Defect Augmentation With Autogenous Bone: A Study in Beagle Dogs
Would Nitric Oxide be an Effective Marker for Earlier Stages of Peri-Implant Disease? An
The Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Cement-Retained Implant-Supported
Effect of Rotating Osteotomes on Primary Implant Stability—An In Vitro Investigation
Horizontal Augmentation Through the Ridge-Split Procedure: A Predictable Surgical
The Bis-Acryl Stent
Clinical, Histological, and Histomorphometrical Analysis of Maxillary Sinus Augmentation
A Technique to Salvage a Single Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prosthesis Having a
Ridge Expansion and Immediate Placement With Piezosurgery and Screw Expanders in
Pterygoid Implants for Maxillofacial Rehabilitation of a Patient With a Bilateral Maxillectomy
Technology in Maxillary Premolar Region: A New Strategy for Soft Tissue Management
Fracture of Anterior Iliac Crest Following Bone Graft Harvest in an Anorexic Patient: Case
A Technique for Constructing a New Maxillary Overdenture to a Nonretrievable Implant
Edentulous Maxillary Arch Fixed Implant Rehabilitation Using a Hybrid Prosthesis Made of
Journal of Oral Implantology February 2013
http://www.brightcopy.net/allen/orim/Glossary
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/orim/40-6
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/orim/40-5
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/orim/40-4
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/orim/40-s1
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/orim/40-3
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/orim/40-2
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/orim/40-1
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/orim/39-6
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/orim/39-5
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/orim/39-4
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/orim/39-3
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/orim/39-s1
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/orim/39-2
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/orim/39-1
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/orim/38-6
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/orim/38-5
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/orim/38-s1
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/orim/38-4
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/orim/38-3
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/orim/38-2
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/orim/38-1
https://www.nxtbookmedia.com