APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 56

»
FORMULATION AND DEVELOPMENT
»
R Code to Estimate Probability of Passing
USP Dissolution Test
Prasanth Sambaraju
Independent Researcher
Abstract
considered pass if all six units are ≥ Q + 5%. The probability of passing
can be directly computed P{Pass S1
one unit greater than Q + 5%. In case of S2 and S3, no exact formulas
Dissolution testing is required by the United State Pharmacopeia (USP)
to ensure that the drug products meet the established standards of
strength, quality and stability. A manufacturing process is considered
to be in compliance only if it meets the respective acceptance criteria
for tests like content uniformity and dissolution at different times
during the process. The article proposes a custom written code in R
based on a reported method to estimate the probability of passing the
multistage USP dissolution test.
Keywords Dissolution, USP<711>, Acceptance criteria, Simulation,
Introduction
Dissolution testing for solid oral drug formulations was introduced
in the 1960s and is used to predict the in vivo drug release.
Dissolution testing provides useful information during the entire
drug development process. It is used to select the most suitable
formulation, test for batch-to-batch reproducibility and performance
throughout its shelf life. USP <711>1
provides guidance for acceptance
criteria for immediate-release dosage forms, which consists of three
stages of testing. In the case of S1
testing six units are tested and are
Table 1. USP <711> dissolution test acceptance criteria for
immediate-release dosage forms
Stage of
dissolution
S1
S2
Numbers
tested
6
6
Acceptance criteria
(1)
Each unit is not less than Q + 5%
For 12 units
a) Average of (S1
b) No unit (S1
S3
12
For 24 units
a) Average of (S1
+ S2
+ S2) is equal to or greater than Q
) is less than Q - 15%
T1, T2 and T3 represent the events which meet the criteria for S1, S2 and
+ S2+ S3) is equal to or greater than Q
b) No more than 2 units are less than Q - 15 %
c) No unit is less than Q - 25 %
S3 stage respectively. The event of passing the USP dissolution test is
given by T1
T2
56 |
| September/October 2023
T3
.
are available due to the conditional nature of the test.2
A Monte Carlo simulation method was employed to estimate the
probability of passing the dissolution test. It was observed that the
probability of passing is dependent on mean and standard deviation
(expressed as percentage of labelled content) of the representative
samples tested from the manufactured batch. Normal distribution
was considered a suitable model, since the amount of drug dissolved
from each unit tested is dependent on a large number of variables.3
A parametric bootstrap method in combination with Monte
Carlo simulation was proposed to obtain sampling distribution
of estimated probabilities of passing USP dissolution test and its
confidence intervals.4
Method
Wang proposed a close-form approximation to estimate the
probability of passing the USP dissolution test, under the assumption
that the results of dissolution follow normal distribution with known
mean and standard deviation.5
If yi
, i = 1, 2, . . . , 24 represent the sample dissolution results and ȳk
represent the average of y1
, y2, . . .,yk. The events of passing three stages
for USP dissolution test are expressed as
} = p6, where p is the probability of
С
С

APR Sept/Oct 2023

Table of Contents for the Digital Edition of APR Sept/Oct 2023

INSIDER INSIGHT - From Guidelines to Standards: Why Comprehensive AI Regulation is Essential to Spurring Innovation
BIOPHARMACEUTICAL - Aseptic Process Simulation: Cell and Gene Therapy Manufacture
FORMULATION & DEVELOPMENT - Challenges of Analytical Validation for ATMPs
QC Corner - The Intricacies of Testing for Mycoplasmas in Cell Culture Systems
MICROBIOLOGY - Standardized, Scalable And Efficient: Producing Recombinant Factor C to Quality Standards
FORMULATION AND DEVELOPMENT - R Code to Estimate Probability of Passing USP Dissolution Test
FORMULATION AND DEVELOPMENT - Cloud Computing for Drug Discovery: The Time is Now
CGT CIRCUIT - Navigating the Complex Testing Strategies for Viral Vector-based Gene Therapies
MANUFACTURING - Simplifying Finished Product Manufacturer Site Transfer Variations
FORMULATION AND DEVELOPMENT - Advancing Regulatory Compliance with Natural Language Processing
DRUG DELIVERY - Finding a Greater Vantage Point for Creating Green Therapies
WHITEPAPER - Microbial Testing for the Pharmaceutical Industry
Facility Tour - Eurofins BioPharma Product Testing
ROUNDTABLE - Drug Delivery
MANUFACTURING - Accelerating Biologics R&D with Unified Software and Data Flows
An Interview with Jason Downing, Senior Product Manager, TriLink BioTechnologies®
FORMULATION AND DEVELOPMENT - The Role of Data in the Pharmaceutical Lifecycle
BIOPHARMACEUTICAL - Uniting Quality Expectations on Reinvigorated Biopharma Campuses
WHITEPAPER - VITAMIN C – Tableting with LUBRITAB® RBW Lubricant
WHITEPAPER - Leveraging Analytical Technology Process for CMC
BIOPHARMACEUTICAL - Maximizing the Commercialization Potential of Cell and Gene Therapies
MICROBIOLOGY - Comments on Aseptic Process Simulation (APS) in the New EU GMP Annex 1
VENDOR VIEWPOINT - Continuous & Intervention-Free Microbial Monitoring
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - Cover1
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - Cover2
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 1
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 2
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 3
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 4
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 5
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 6
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 7
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 8
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 9
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 10
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 11
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 12
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 13
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 14
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 15
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 16
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 17
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 18
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 19
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 20
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 21
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 22
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 23
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 24
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 25
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 26
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 27
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 28
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 29
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 30
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - INSIDER INSIGHT - From Guidelines to Standards: Why Comprehensive AI Regulation is Essential to Spurring Innovation
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 32
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 33
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - BIOPHARMACEUTICAL - Aseptic Process Simulation: Cell and Gene Therapy Manufacture
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 35
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 36
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 37
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 38
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 39
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 40
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 41
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 42
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 43
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - FORMULATION & DEVELOPMENT - Challenges of Analytical Validation for ATMPs
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 45
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 46
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 47
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 48
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 49
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - QC Corner - The Intricacies of Testing for Mycoplasmas in Cell Culture Systems
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 51
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - MICROBIOLOGY - Standardized, Scalable And Efficient: Producing Recombinant Factor C to Quality Standards
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 53
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 54
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 55
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - FORMULATION AND DEVELOPMENT - R Code to Estimate Probability of Passing USP Dissolution Test
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 57
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 58
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 59
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 60
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 61
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - FORMULATION AND DEVELOPMENT - Cloud Computing for Drug Discovery: The Time is Now
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 63
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 64
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 65
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 66
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 67
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - CGT CIRCUIT - Navigating the Complex Testing Strategies for Viral Vector-based Gene Therapies
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 69
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - MANUFACTURING - Simplifying Finished Product Manufacturer Site Transfer Variations
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 71
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 72
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 73
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - FORMULATION AND DEVELOPMENT - Advancing Regulatory Compliance with Natural Language Processing
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 75
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 76
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 77
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - DRUG DELIVERY - Finding a Greater Vantage Point for Creating Green Therapies
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 79
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 80
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 81
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - WHITEPAPER - Microbial Testing for the Pharmaceutical Industry
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 83
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 84
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 85
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - Facility Tour - Eurofins BioPharma Product Testing
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 87
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 88
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - ROUNDTABLE - Drug Delivery
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 90
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 91
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - MANUFACTURING - Accelerating Biologics R&D with Unified Software and Data Flows
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 93
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - An Interview with Jason Downing, Senior Product Manager, TriLink BioTechnologies®
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 95
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - FORMULATION AND DEVELOPMENT - The Role of Data in the Pharmaceutical Lifecycle
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 97
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 98
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - BIOPHARMACEUTICAL - Uniting Quality Expectations on Reinvigorated Biopharma Campuses
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 100
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 101
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - WHITEPAPER - VITAMIN C – Tableting with LUBRITAB® RBW Lubricant
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 103
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - WHITEPAPER - Leveraging Analytical Technology Process for CMC
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 105
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 106
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - BIOPHARMACEUTICAL - Maximizing the Commercialization Potential of Cell and Gene Therapies
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 108
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 109
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - MICROBIOLOGY - Comments on Aseptic Process Simulation (APS) in the New EU GMP Annex 1
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 111
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 112
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 113
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - VENDOR VIEWPOINT - Continuous & Intervention-Free Microbial Monitoring
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 115
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 116
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 117
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 118
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 119
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - 120
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - Cover3
APR Sept/Oct 2023 - Cover4
https://www.nxtbookmedia.com