SpecialReport: Hydraulic Fracturing Tech FIGURE 2 Statistical Analysis of Proppant Placement Effectiveness (Microproppant versus Non-Microproppant Stages) 90% 100% 80% 70% 50% 60% rr=16.1% =13.1% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 10 0.42 Count Median Avg Outliers Baseline 24 0.40627 0.357844 4 Microproppant 0.532104 0.485678 Clusters Target Hole Size Test Baseline 610 0.386152 -0.340223 2 Microproppant 9 0.386152 -0.340223 2 14 Color by: Test Baseline Microproppant Reference points: Median FIGURE 3 Stage 12 Treating Plot Showing Microproppant-Induced Pressure Reduction Treating Pressure (psi) A 12,000 10,000 6,000 8,000 4,000 2,000 20 :00 10/16/2021 01 2 3 4 5 Tons of Microproppant On Perfs AUGUST 2022 75 Time 20:20 20:40 21:00 21:20 21:40 10/16/2021 Slurry Rate (bpm) Slurry Proppant Conc (lb/gal) BH Proppant Conc (lb/gal) Wellhead Proppant Conc (lb/gal) Backside Pressure (psi) Micro Prop Conc (lb/gal) Microproppant On Perfs Microproppant Off Perfs A B C C C A C BC 120 140 160 180 200 60 80 100 40 20 10 5 6 7 8 9 2 3 4 1 Uniformity Index