IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 18

dihedral component is described by two parameters: The
scattering amplitude

Table 5. POSSIBLE RADAR OBSERVABLES ESTIMATED
FROM THE SECOND-ORDER STATISTICAL PARAMETERS AND
THEIR RELATION TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS/
APPLICATION EXAMPLES [15].
Second-order
Statistical Parameter


Application Examples

Entropy (H)

Segmentation and classification

Anisotropy (A)

Segmentation and classification
Surface roughness estimation
(bare surfaces)

Alpha angle (a)

Segmentation and classification
Soil moisture estimation
(bare surfaces)

Beta angle (b)

Surface slope estimation
(azimuth direction)

	

and the ratio
	

indicates dihedral (or helix type) scattering mechanisms.
The beta scattering angle, b i = arctan (|e 3i|/|e 2i|), ranges
between - r and r and describes the line-of-sight rotation
(given by b/2) of the scatterer represented by [Ti] . The existence of three such a i and b i scattering angles motivates a
statistical interpretation in terms of mean scattering angles,
given by
	

a = p1 a1 + p2 a2 + p3 a3
	
b = p1 b1 + p2 b2 + p3 b3 .

(21)

The entropy/(mean) alpha (H/a) space has been used
primarily for the initialization of unsupervised classifications [15]. In Table 5 second-order statistical parameters
and their corresponding applications are listed.
2) Model-Based Decomposition: Model-based decompositions have been proposed and applied, in order to
decompose the individual scattering contribution into
a set of predefined elementary scattering contributions
[45]-[48].
One of the first model-based decompositions used to fit
and to interpret SAR data is the Three-Component Decomposition proposed by A. Freeman and S.L. Durden in 1998
[45]. The model decomposes the measured coherency
matrix [T] into a Bragg scattering component (first matrix),
a (smooth) dihedral reflection (second matrix), and into a
volume of randomly oriented dipole scattering elements
(third matrix)
R 2
V
R
V
*
2 0 0
S a a 0W
S1 b 2 0W
fv
*
	 [T] = fs Sb b 0W + fd S a 1 0W + 4 >0 1 0H.	(22)
S 0 0 0W
S0 0 0W
0 0 1
44 2 44 3
1 4T44 2 4 44 3X 1 4T44 2 4 44 3X 1Volume
scattering
Surface scattering

Dihedral scattering

The surface contribution is described by two parameters: The real ratio b = (R s + R p) / (R s - R p) and the backscattering contribution fs = R s - R p 2 where R s and R p are the
Bragg scattering coefficients perpendicular and parallel to
the incident plane and depend on the dielectric constant
of the surface and the incidence angle [15], [35]. Also the
18

1
fd = 2 R sh R th + R sv R tv exp (iz) 2	(23)

a=

R sh R th - R sv R tv exp (iz)
.	(24)
R sh R th + R sv R tv exp (iz)

The horizontal and vertical Fresnel coefficients for the
soil R sh and R sv and for the trunk R th and R tv depend on the
soil (trunk) dielectric constants and the corresponding incidence angle [15], [35]. The volume component fv is often
approximated by a cloud of ellipsoids [35]. The phase component z accounts for any differential propagation effects
in the volume. Hence, the scattering properties of the layer
(neglecting multiple scattering interactions) are controlled
by three parameters: The electromagnetic density of the
volume that affects the scattered power, the shape and
the orientation distribution of the volume particles. The
exact volume formulation is described in [35], [49]. The
scattering power of the surface Ps, dihedral Pd and volume
Pv component are given by the trace of the corresponding
coherency matrices
	

Ps = fs $ (1 + b 2), Pd = fd $ (1 + a 2), Pv = fv .	(25)

The total power is obtained as
	

Ptot = Ps + Pd + Pv

	
= fs $ (1 + b 2) + fd $ (1 + a 2) + fv .

(26)

Eq. (22) leads to an under-determined inversion problem of 5 (3 real and one complex) observables for six (real)
unknown parameters. For this, the non-dominant of the
two components, either surface or dihedral, is set to a con*
stant value according to the sign of Re {1 S HH S VV
2} after
removal of the volume contribution. Surface scattering is
dominant if this term is positive otherwise dihedral scattering is dominant.
The described canonical models have been widely
used as elements of different decomposition approaches.
Beyond this, several modifications have been proposed
in order to improve the interpretation of real scattering
scenarios by means of more realistic model components
[49], [50]. Besides the interpretation of polarimetric data
over vegetated terrain, model-based decompositions
have been used to initialize and support polarimetric
segmentation and classification approaches [15]. Fig. 9
shows on the top the Freeman and Durden decomposition applied on quad-polarimetric L-band data acquired
by DLR's E-SAR system over the Oberpfaffenhofen test
site. Red, green and blue correspond to fd, fv and fs . In
a second step, the dominant of the three contributions
has been used to classify the scene into three classes:
Dihedral, volume and surface like scatterers. These three
classes are then used to initialize a statistical Wishart
ieee Geoscience and remote sensing magazine

march 2013



Table of Contents for the Digital Edition of IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013

IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - Cover1
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - Cover2
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 1
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 2
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 3
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 4
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 5
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 6
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 7
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 8
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 9
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 10
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 11
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 12
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 13
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 14
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 15
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 16
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 17
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 18
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 19
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 20
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 21
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 22
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 23
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 24
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 25
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 26
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 27
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 28
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 29
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 30
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 31
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 32
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 33
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 34
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 35
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 36
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 37
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 38
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 39
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 40
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 41
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 42
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 43
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 44
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 45
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 46
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 47
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 48
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 49
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 50
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 51
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 52
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 53
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 54
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 55
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 56
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 57
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 58
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 59
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 60
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 61
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 62
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 63
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 64
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 65
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 66
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 67
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 68
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 69
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 70
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 71
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 72
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 73
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 74
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 75
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 76
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 77
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 78
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 79
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - 80
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - Cover3
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine - March 2013 - Cover4
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_december2023
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_september2023
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_june2023
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_march2023
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_december2022
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_september2022
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_june2022
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_march2022
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_december2021
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_september2021
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_june2021
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_march2021
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_december2020
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_september2020
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_june2020
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_march2020
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_december2019
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_september2019
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_june2019
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_march2019
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_december2018
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_september2018
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_june2018
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_march2018
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_december2017
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_september2017
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_june2017
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_march2017
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_december2016
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_september2016
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_june2016
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_march2016
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_december2015
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_september2015
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_june2015
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_march2015
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_december2014
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_september2014
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_june2014
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_march2014
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_december2013
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_september2013
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_june2013
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/geoscience_march2013
https://www.nxtbookmedia.com