MARCH 2022 * IEEE ROBOTICS & AUTOMATION MAGAZINE * 87 Manipulation Pointing 8 6 4 2 8 6 4 2 8 6 4 2 8 6 4 2 8 6 4 2 8 6 4 2 8 6 4 2 MT = 0.954 + 0.441 . ID MT = 0.546 + 0.407 . ID R2 = 0.778 R2 = 0.838 MT = 1.072 + 0.508 . ID MT = 0.694+ 0.450 . ID R2 = 0.869 R2 = 0.862 MT = 1.134 + 0.522 . ID MT = 0.703 + 0.485 . ID R2 = 0.776 R2 = 0.852 MT = 0.874 + 0.595 . ID MT = 0.453 + 0.557 . ID R2 = 0.773 R2 = 0.859 MT = 0.874 + 0.595 . ID MT = 0.453 + 0.557 . ID R2 = 0.773 R2 = 0.859 MT = 1.072 + 0.508 . ID MT = 0.694 + 0.450 . ID R2 = 0.869 R2 = 0.862 MT = 0.555 + 0.649 . [1.0 . IDT+ 0. IDR] MT = 0.224 + 0.580 . [1.0 . IDT+ 0. IDR] R2 = 0.877 R2 = 0.887 01 23 45 Index of Difficulty (bit/s) (a) Experiment 1 MT = 1.541 + 0.315 . ID - 0.0003.sin(θ2) + 0.0048.θ1 MT = 1.007 + 0.362 . ID + 0.0003.sin(θ2) - 0.0034.θ1 MT = 1.283 + 0.430 . [1.0 . IDT+ 0.IDR] MT = 0.517 + 0.495 . [1.0 . IDT+ 0. IDR] R2 = 0.509 R2 = 0.788 12 34 Index of Difficulty (bit/s) (b) Experiment 2 R2 = 0.574 R2 = 0.833 MT = 1.882 + 0.544 . [0 . IDT+ 1.0 . IDR] MT = 1.209 + 1.298 . [0 . IDT+ 1.0 . IDR] R2 = 0.804 R2 = 0.901 (c) Experiment 3 Index of Difficulty (bit/s) (d) Experiment 4 MT = 1.446 + 0.390 . ID MT = 0.656 + 0.435 . ID R2 = 0.585 R2 = 0.845 MT = 1.066 + 0.525 . ID MT = -0.648 + 1.224 . ID R2 = 0.600 R2 = 0.659 MT =1.412 + 0.390 . ID MT = 0.694 + 0.434 . ID R2 = 0.575 R2 = 0.831 MT = 1.114 + 0.641 . ID MT = -0.556 + 1.503 . ID R2 = 0.613 R2 = 0.680 MT = 1.594 + 0.334 . ID MT = 0.897 + 0.372 . ID R2 = 0.577 R2 = 0.832 MT = 1.114 + 0.641 . ID MT = -0.556 + 1.503 . ID R2 = 0.613 R2 = 0.680 MT = 0.188 + 0.693 . ID MT = 0.312 + 0.570 . ID R2 = 0.759 R2 = 0.476 MT = 0.280 + 0.587 . ID - 0.0003.sin(θ2) + 0.0062.θ1 MT = 0.210 + 0.530 . ID + 0.0011.sin(θ2) + 0.0034.θ1 R2 = 0.770 R2 = 0.578 MT = 0.846 + 1.0 . [0.691 .IDT+ 0.913 .IDR] MT = 1.094 + 1.0 . [0.326 . IDT+ 1.179 .IDR] R2 = 0.803 R2 = 0.805 12 34 56 24 68 Index of Difficulty (bit/s) Figure 6. Regression results of all models from experiments 1-4, depicting line equations and r2. Green boxes indicate the best model. (a) Experiment 1: translation. (b) Experiment 2: translation with directions and inclinations. (c) Experiment 3: rotation. (d) Experiment 4: combined with directions and inclinations. MT = 1.652 + 0.315 . ID MT = 0.944 + 0.362 . ID R2 = 0.511 R2 = 0.789 MT = 1.347 + 0.585 . ID MT = -0.003 + 1.368 . ID R2 = 0.610 R2 = 0.673 MT = 0.176 + 0.693 . ID MT = 0.362 + 0.570 . ID R2 = 0.758 R2 = 0.469 MT = 1.066 + 0.525 . ID MT = -0.648 + 1.224 . ID R2 = 0.600 R2 = 0.659 MT = 0.765 + 0.608 . ID MT = 0.849 + 0.500 . ID R2 = 0.755 R2 = 0.465 MT = 1.494 + 0.274 . ID MT = 0.786 + 0.305 . ID R2 = 0.579 R2 = 0.832 R2 = 0.604 R2 = 0.663 MT = 0.408 + 0.587 . ID MT = 0.336 + 0.530 . ID R2 = 0.762 R2 = 0.569 R2 = 0.748 R2 = 0.459 MT = 1.062 + 0.523 . ID MT = -0.656 + 1.221 . ID MT = 0.298 + 0.520 . ID MT = 0.472 + 0.426 . ID Our Model MT (s) Cha and Myung Murata and Iwase MT (s) MT (s) Shannon MT (s) Welford MT (s) Hoffmann MT (s) MT (s) Fitts