Signal Processing - November 2017 - 42
Also, it provides an efficient inference mechanism that directly
-produces pixel-wise class predictions with a single forward
pass of an input image regardless of its size.
Later approaches based on FCN-style architectures
improve prediction accuracy by considering low-level image
structures and building a deeper network architecture. One
popular way to refine the predicted labels is to apply postprocessing based on a graphical model such as fully connected
conditional random field (CRF) [23]. It regularizes the predicted labels to coincide with visually similar pixels, thus it
encourages the inferred labels to preserve underlying image
structures such as object boundaries. Specifically, Chen et al.
[5] propose to integrate prediction results of the network with
fully connected CRF and estimate the final pixel-wise labels
by solving an optimization problem based on the CRF model.
The approach is improved in [57] by decomposing CRF with
several steps of differentiable operations and modeling each
step with an individual neural network, where all networks are
nicely integrated into a single DCNN for end-to-end training.
The idea of integrating CRF is further extended by modeling
pairwise relationship between output units to consider spatial
context between semantic classes [27], [31]. Apart from CRF,
there have been approaches to improve the performance by
considering multiscale predictions. For example, [5] employs
a set of convolution filters sampled from multiple scales to
capture objects with variable sizes, while [6] performs semantic segmentation in multiple scales and aggregate the results
via weighted summation, where the weights are also predicted
for each scale by an independent model.
On the other hand, some approaches propose building a
deep encoder-decoder network for precise per-pixel class prediction [33], [42]. A typical architecture of the deep encoderdecoder network is illustrated in Figure 3(b). Contrary to the
FCN-style architecture that has a single up-sampling layer,
they employ a deep decoder on top of the encoder output to
recover the original input image resolution. Specifically, Noh
et al. [33] propose a deconvolution network, which has a symmetric architecture of encoder and decoder, where the decoder
is implemented by stacks of deconvolution layers and unpooling operations. The similar architecture is employed in [42]
together with an efficient data augmentation technique for the
task of biomedical image segmentation.
These approaches have been successful in semantic segmentation even on real-world images [11], [29] when a sufficiently
large number of training images with pixel-wise annotations
are available. However, such annotations require a tremendous
amount of labeling cost and is available only in a few data sets
with a limited number of semantic categories. To resolve the difficulties in training data collection and design more flexible and
scalable models for semantic segmentation, approaches based on
weakly supervised semantic segmentation have been proposed to
utilize much weaker labels than pixel-wise ones.
Weakly supervised semantic segmentation
This section introduces weakly supervised semantic segmentation and discusses relevant approaches based on DCNNs.
42
The goal of weakly supervised semantic segmentation is to
leverage weak annotations instead of pixel-wise ones to learn
models for semantic segmentation. Weak labels for semantic segmentation include, but is not limited to, image-level
class label, bounding box, scribble, and point supervision as
illustrated in Figure 2. These labels are easier to collect than
pixel-wise labels as they require much less annotation cost.
For example, the annotation time of image-level class labels is
that of only one-tenth of pixel-level segmentation annotations
[4]. Thus, one can easily build a weakly annotated image data
set for diverse semantic categories on a large scale, and such a
training data set will, accordingly, allow to learn a model for
semantic segmentation in the wild.
The main challenge in weakly supervised semantic segmentation is that the weak labels provide only a part of the
supervision required for semantic segmentation. For example,
none of weak labels presented in Figure 2 provide information
about object shape, which is a critical evidence required to
learn a model predicting segmentation masks. Therefore, to
train a model for segmentation with incomplete supervision
in weakly labeled data, the latent per-pixel ground truth as
well as the model parameters should be jointly estimated during training. In the following sections, we introduce various
types of weak labels employed in the literature and discuss the
related approaches in detail.
Image-level class label
Image-level class label is the simplest form of weak supervision for semantic segmentation as it indicates only presence or
absence of a semantic entity in an image. Because it requires
the least amount of human annotation cost and is already available in existing large-scale data sets such as ImageNet [10],
image-level class label has been most extensively exploited in
weakly supervised semantic segmentation. However, learning segmentation networks from only image-level class labels
is very challenging because spatial information about target
objects are missing.
Some existing approaches resolve this issue by considering pixel-level labels as latent variables, and optimize
parameters of segmentation network jointly with the latent
pixel-level labels. Specifically, they consider outputs from a
convolution layer of DCNN as confidence scores for latent
per-pixel labels. Since the image-level label is the only available supervision in this weakly supervised setting, they
aggregates the output scores over all pixels using a global
pooling operation (e.g., max pooling or average pooling) to
generate image-level class score. Then the network is trained
to maximize image classification performance using imagelevel labels as ground truth. Within this framework, Pathak
et al. [37] formulate the task as a multiple instance learning
problem, where a global max pooling operation is applied to
enforce the constraint that each image should contain at least
one pixel corresponding to the positive class. With the same
motivation, Papandreou et al. [35] adopt a recursive refinement procedure based on expectation-maximization, where
the latent pixel-level labels are predicted by the learned
IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING MAGAZINE
|
November 2017
|
Table of Contents for the Digital Edition of Signal Processing - November 2017
Signal Processing - November 2017 - Cover1
Signal Processing - November 2017 - Cover2
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 1
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 2
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 3
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 4
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 5
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 6
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 7
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 8
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 9
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 10
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 11
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 12
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 13
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 14
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 15
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 16
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 17
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 18
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 19
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 20
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 21
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 22
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 23
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 24
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 25
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 26
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 27
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 28
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 29
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 30
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 31
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 32
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 33
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 34
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 35
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 36
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 37
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 38
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 39
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 40
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 41
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 42
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 43
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 44
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 45
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 46
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 47
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 48
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 49
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 50
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 51
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 52
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 53
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 54
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 55
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 56
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 57
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 58
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 59
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 60
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 61
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 62
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 63
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 64
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 65
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 66
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 67
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 68
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 69
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 70
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 71
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 72
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 73
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 74
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 75
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 76
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 77
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 78
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 79
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 80
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 81
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 82
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 83
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 84
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 85
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 86
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 87
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 88
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 89
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 90
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 91
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 92
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 93
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 94
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 95
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 96
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 97
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 98
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 99
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 100
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 101
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 102
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 103
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 104
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 105
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 106
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 107
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 108
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 109
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 110
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 111
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 112
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 113
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 114
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 115
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 116
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 117
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 118
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 119
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 120
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 121
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 122
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 123
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 124
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 125
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 126
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 127
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 128
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 129
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 130
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 131
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 132
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 133
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 134
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 135
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 136
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 137
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 138
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 139
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 140
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 141
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 142
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 143
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 144
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 145
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 146
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 147
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 148
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 149
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 150
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 151
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 152
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 153
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 154
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 155
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 156
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 157
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 158
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 159
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 160
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 161
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 162
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 163
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 164
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 165
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 166
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 167
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 168
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 169
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 170
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 171
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 172
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 173
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 174
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 175
Signal Processing - November 2017 - 176
Signal Processing - November 2017 - Cover3
Signal Processing - November 2017 - Cover4
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_201809
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_201807
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_201805
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_201803
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_201801
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_1117
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0917
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0717
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0517
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0317
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0117
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_1116
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0916
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0716
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0516
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0316
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0116
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_1115
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0915
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0715
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0515
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0315
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0115
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_1114
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0914
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0714
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0514
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0314
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0114
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_1113
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0913
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0713
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0513
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0313
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0113
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_1112
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0912
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0712
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0512
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0312
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0112
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_1111
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0911
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0711
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0511
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0311
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0111
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_1110
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0910
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0710
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0510
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0310
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0110
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_1109
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0909
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0709
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0509
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0309
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0109
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_1108
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0908
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0708
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0508
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0308
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0108
https://www.nxtbookmedia.com