IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 31
σ2
fR = 1
Distortion
D (R = 1)
DSI (fs, R = 1)
fR = 2
DSI (fs, R = 2)
D (R = 2)
se
m
m
)
(f s
fNyq
fs
0
FIGURE 14. The function D SI (fs, R) for the PSD of Figure 13 with an LPF
with a cutoff frequency of fs /2 and two values of the bit rate R . This
function describes the minimal distortion in recovering a Gaussian signal
with this PSD from a bit rate-R encoded version of its uniform samples.
This minimal distortion is bounded from below by Shannon's DRF of X(t),
where the latter is attained at the sub-Nyquist sampling rate fR .
SΠ(f )
SΛ(f )
Sω(f )
SΩ(f )
1.6
1.4
1.2
fR (Hz)
of D SI (fs, R) associated with the sampling distortion is due
only to those energy bands blocked by the filter. As a result,
the function D SI (fs, R) can be described by the sum of the red
and the blue parts in Figure 13(a). Figure 13(b) describes the
function D SI (fs, R) under the same bit rate R and a higher
sampling rate, while the cutoff frequency of the LPF is
adjusted to this higher sampling rate. As can be seen from the
figure, at this higher sampling rate, D SI (fs, R) equals the DRF
of X (t) in Figure 13(c), although this sampling rate is still
below the Nyquist rate of X (t) . In fact, it follows from
Figure 13 that the DRF of X (t) is attained at some critical
sampling rate f R that equals the spectral occupancy of the preserved part in the Pinsker-Kolmogorov water-filling expression (6). The existence of this critical sampling rate can also
be seen in Figure 14, which illustrates D SI (fs, R) as a function
of fs with H(f) an LPF.
In the "Shift-Invariant Sampling" section, we concluded
that the DRF of X (t) can be attained by sampling at or above
the Nyquist rate, since then the MMSE term in (6) vanishes.
Now we see that by using the LPF with a cutoff frequency of
fs /2 , the equality between D SI (fs, R) and the DRF, which is the
minimal distortion subject to a bit-rate constraint, occurs at a
sampling rate smaller than the Nyquist rate.
An intriguing way to explain this phenomena is as an
alignment of the degrees of freedom in the signal after the
presampling operation with the degrees of freedom that the
lossy compression with bit rate R can capture in this sampled signal. For stationary Gaussian signals, the degrees of
freedom in the signal representation are those spectral bands
where the PSD is nonzero. When the signal energy is not uniformly distributed over these bands-unlike in the example of
the PSD in (11)-the optimal lossy compression scheme calls
for discarding those bands with the lowest energy, i.e., the
parts of the signal with the lowest uncertainty. The presampling operation removes these low-energy signal components
such that the resulting signal has the same degrees of freedom
as those that can be captured by the lossy compressed signal representation that follows the sampler. Thus, the presampling operation in a sense aligns the degrees of freedom
of the presampled signal with those of the postsampled lossy
compression operation.
The degree to which the new critical rate f R is smaller than
the Nyquist rate depends on the energy distribution of X (t)
along its spectral occupancy. The more uniform it is, the more
degrees of freedom are required to represent the lossy compressed signal, and therefore f R is closer to the Nyquist rate.
Figure 15 shows the dependency of f R on R for various PSD
functions. Note that, whenever the energy distribution is not
uniform and the signal is bandlimited, the critical rate f R converges to the Nyquist rate as R extends to infinity and to zero
as R reaches zero.
In the prior discussion, we considered only signals with unimodal PSDs (for example, the PSD in Figure 9 is not unimodal). The main challenge in extending the previously mentioned
conclusions to signals with nonunimodal PSDs is the design of
a sub-Nyquist system that samples the signal components con-
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0.5
1
R (bit/s)
1.5
2
FIGURE 15. The critical sampling rate fR as a function of the bit rate
R for the PSDs given in the small frames. For the bandlimited PSDs
S P (f ), S K(f ) and S ~ (f ), the critical sampling rate is always below the
Nyquist rate. The critical sampling rate is finite for any R, even for the
nonbandlimited PSD S X (f ).
taining the most information about the signal (i.e., the signal's
high-energy bands) to obtain the optimal lossy compressed
signal representation when these samples are encoded at the
fixed bit rate R. Before describing this extension, we consider the general structure of a presampling transformation that
minimizes the distortion in the ADX setting.
Optimal presampling transformation
We now consider the presampling filter H(f) that minimizes
the function D SI (fs, R) subject to a fixed bit rate R and sampling rate fs . By examining expressions (9) and (S10), we conclude that this minimization is equivalent to the maximization
IEEE Signal Processing Magazine
|
May 2018
|
31
Table of Contents for the Digital Edition of IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018
Contents
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - Cover1
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - Cover2
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - Contents
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 2
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 3
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 4
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 5
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 6
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 7
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 8
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 9
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 10
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 11
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 12
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 13
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 14
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 15
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 16
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 17
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 18
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 19
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 20
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 21
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 22
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 23
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 24
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 25
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 26
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 27
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 28
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 29
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 30
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 31
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 32
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 33
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 34
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 35
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 36
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 37
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 38
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 39
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 40
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 41
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 42
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 43
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 44
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 45
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 46
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 47
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 48
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 49
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 50
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 51
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 52
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 53
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 54
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 55
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 56
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 57
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 58
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 59
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 60
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 61
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 62
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 63
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 64
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 65
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 66
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 67
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 68
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 69
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 70
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 71
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 72
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 73
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 74
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 75
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 76
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 77
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 78
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 79
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 80
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 81
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 82
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 83
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 84
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 85
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 86
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 87
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 88
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 89
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 90
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 91
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 92
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 93
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 94
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 95
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 96
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 97
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 98
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 99
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 100
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 101
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 102
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 103
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 104
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 105
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 106
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 107
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 108
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 109
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 110
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 111
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 112
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 113
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 114
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 115
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 116
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 117
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 118
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 119
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 120
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 121
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 122
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 123
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 124
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 125
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 126
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 127
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 128
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 129
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 130
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 131
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - 132
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - Cover3
IEEE Signal Processing - May 2018 - Cover4
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_201809
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_201807
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_201805
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_201803
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_201801
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_1117
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0917
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0717
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0517
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0317
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0117
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_1116
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0916
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0716
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0516
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0316
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0116
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_1115
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0915
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0715
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0515
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0315
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0115
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_1114
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0914
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0714
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0514
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0314
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0114
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_1113
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0913
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0713
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0513
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0313
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0113
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_1112
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0912
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0712
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0512
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0312
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0112
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_1111
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0911
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0711
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0511
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0311
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0111
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_1110
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0910
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0710
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0510
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0310
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0110
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_1109
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0909
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0709
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0509
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0309
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0109
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_1108
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0908
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0708
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0508
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0308
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ieee/signalprocessing_0108
https://www.nxtbookmedia.com