For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - 6
that "it was standard practice for the District
Attorney [of Philadelphia, the largest office
in the Commonwealth] to prepare for PCRA
hearings relating to trial counsel's performance
by interviewing trial counsel in private prior to
the hearing."7
The trial court granted the motion to preclude, relying on trial counsel's refusal to cooperate with PCRA counsel, the narrow scope of the
inquiry at the PCRA hearing, and the importance
of the attorney-client relationship.8 The court
noted, however, that the more appropriate relief
might have been directed at trial counsel rather
than to the District Attorney.
The Superior Court affirmed. Its ruling rested
both on an understanding of the scope of the
privilege waiver in an ineffectiveness claim and
on the nature of trial counsel's continuing ethical
duties to a former client.
The Court's privilege reasoning was broad
and independent of the case-specific facts
relating to trial counsel's hostility. Under the
Supreme Court's rulings in Commonwealth
v. Flor9 and Commonwealth v. Harris,10 an
assertion of ineffective assistance of counsel
waives the privilege only as to the particular
instances or claims of ineffectiveness, and
the attorney-client communication and work
product privileges survive as to all other
communications and work. For both the Flor
and Harris courts, the "mere potential" that
privileged material could be disclosed justified
orders to restrict prosecution access to defense
files and experts.11 Accordingly, the King Court
ruled that a preclusion order was necessary to
avoid that risk:
Therefore, we conclude that the PCRA
court in this case correctly determined
that a preclusion order was necessary. A
private interview between prosecutors
and trial counsel could easily become
a freewheeling inquiry into privileged
matters that fall outside the scope of
the ineffectiveness claims raised by
Appellee. As in Harris, the only way to
guard against this hazard is to order
the Commonwealth to refrain from
interviewing trial counsel in advance of
the PCRA evidentiary hearing.12
6
For The Defense | Vol. 2, Issue 4
The Superior Court then discussed another
reason to uphold the trial court's ruling: the trial
judge's inherent power to prevent a reasonably
anticipated breach of the ethical rules. The Court
cited two Rules of Professional Conduct: RPC
1.9 and 1.6. Rule 1.9 imposes a continuing duty
of loyalty to former clients. Rule 1.6 "precludes
disclosure of any other information gained in
the professional relationship that the client
has requested be held inviolate or that would
be detrimental to the client" - a restriction
that is broader than that of the attorney-client
privilege.13 While Rule 1.6(c)(4)'s so-called
"self-defense" exception to the privilege permits
disclosure to respond to a claim of ineffectiveness, that exception has a "reasonable necessity"
limitation. King's trial counsel's "uncooperative
attitude towards PCRA counsel" led the court to
believe that he would not respect those ethical
boundaries and that consequently, a preclusion
order was necessary.14
ABA Formal Opinion 10-456
The King court noted that the parties and two
We are proud members
of the
Pennsylvania AssociaƟon
of Criminal Defense Lawyers
www.blankrome.com
Joseph G. Poluka * Mark M. Lee * Nicholas C. Harbist
http://www.blankrome.com
Table of Contents for the Digital Edition of For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017
Table of Contents
Commonwealth v. Jerome King and Beyond: Trial Counsel’s Obligation to Cooperate with an Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claim
United States ex rel. Petratos v. Genentech Inc. – The Third Circuit Embraces A Rigorous Pleading Standard for Materiality In False Claims Act Suits, But Leaves Healthcare Industry Defendants Vulnerable On Medicare Claims
Changes in the DUI Landscape: Acts 33 and 30
Police Misconduct Resulting in Arrest: Weighing the Options
Dying with Dignity: Compassionate Release in Pennsylvania
Amicus Matters
Attorney Discipline
Finding the Hidden Data in Technology to Defend Your Client
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - 1
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - 2
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - Table of Contents
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - 4
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - Commonwealth v. Jerome King and Beyond: Trial Counsel’s Obligation to Cooperate with an Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claim
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - 6
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - 7
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - 8
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - 9
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - 10
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - United States ex rel. Petratos v. Genentech Inc. – The Third Circuit Embraces A Rigorous Pleading Standard for Materiality In False Claims Act Suits, But Leaves Healthcare Industry Defendants Vulnerable On Medicare Claims
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - 12
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - 13
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - 14
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - 15
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - 16
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - 17
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - Changes in the DUI Landscape: Acts 33 and 30
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - 19
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - 20
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - 21
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - Police Misconduct Resulting in Arrest: Weighing the Options
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - 23
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - 24
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - 25
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - 26
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - 27
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - 28
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - Dying with Dignity: Compassionate Release in Pennsylvania
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - 30
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - 31
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - 32
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - 33
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - 34
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - Amicus Matters
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - 36
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - 37
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - 38
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - 39
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - Attorney Discipline
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - 41
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - 42
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - 43
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - Finding the Hidden Data in Technology to Defend Your Client
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - 45
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - 46
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - 47
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - 48
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - 49
For the Defense - Volume 2, Issue 4 - 2017 - 50
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/PACDL/FORTHEDEFENSE_vol9_issue2_2024
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/PACDL/FORTHEDEFENSE_vol9_issue1_2024
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/PACDL/FORTHEDEFENSE_vol8_issue4_2023
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/PACDL/FORTHEDEFENSE_vol8_issue3_2023
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/PACDL/FORTHEDEFENSE_vol8_issue2_2023
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/PACDL/FORTHEDEFENSE_vol8_issue1_2023
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/PACDL/FORTHEDEFENSE_vol7_issue4_2022
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/PACDL/FORTHEDEFENSE_vol7_issue3_2022
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/PACDL/FORTHEDEFENSE_vol7_issue2_2022
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/PACDL/FORTHEDEFENSE_vol7_issue1_2022
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/PACDL/FORTHEDEFENSE_vol6_issue4_2021
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/PACDL/FORTHEDEFENSE_vol6_issue3_2021
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/PACDL/FORTHEDEFENSE_vol6_issue2_2021
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/PACDL/FORTHEDEFENSE_vol6_issue1_2021
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/PACDL/FORTHEDEFENSE_vol5_issue4_2020
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/PACDL/FORTHEDEFENSE_vol5_issue3_2020
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/PACDL/FORTHEDEFENSE_vol5_issue2_2020
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/PACDL/FORTHEDEFENSE_vol5_issue1_2020
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/PACDL/FORTHEDEFENSE_vol4_issue4_2019
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/PACDL/FORTHEDEFENSE_vol4_issue3_2019
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/PACDL/FORTHEDEFENSE_vol4_issue2_2019
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/PACDL/FORTHEDEFENSE_vol4_issue1_2019
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/PACDL/FORTHEDEFENSE_vol3_issue4_2018
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/PACDL/FORTHEDEFENSE_vol3_issue3_2018
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/PACDL/FORTHEDEFENSE_vol3_issue2_2018
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/PACDL/FORTHEDEFENSE_vol3_issue1_2018
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/pacdl/FORTHEDEFENSE_vol2_issue4_2017
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/pacdl/FORTHEDEFENSE_vol2_issue3_2017
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/pacdl/FORTHEDEFENSE_vol2_issue2_2017
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/pacdl/FORTHEDEFENSE_vol2_issue1_2017
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/PACDL/FORTHEDEFENSE_vol1_issue4_2016
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/PACDL/FORTHEDEFENSE_vol1_issue3_2016
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/PACDL/FORTHEDEFENSE_vol1_issue2_2016
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/PACDL/FORTHEDEFENSE_vol1_issue1_2016
https://www.nxtbookmedia.com