IEEE Power & Energy Magazine - January/February 2021 - 31

Using short-term pricing to manage the real-time supply and
demand balance in a wholesale electricity market is limited by a
finite upper bound on a supplier's offer price and/or a price cap.
relevant transmission network and other relevant operating
constraints on generation units. As I discuss later, this market
design can foster active participation of final demand in the
wholesale market.
Only generation unit output levels that are physically
feasible will be accepted in both the day-ahead and realtime markets. Prices for the same hour vary depending on
whether the location is in a generation-deficient or generation-rich region of the transmission network. The locational
marginal or nodal price at a given location is the increase
in the minimized value of the " as-offered costs " of serving the locational demands for energy and all ancillary
services as a result of a one-unit increase in the amount
of energy withdrawn at that location in the transmission
network. The price of each ancillary service is equal to the
increase in the optimized value of the objective function as
a result of a one-unit increase in the demand for that ancillary service.
The recent experience of many European countries with
significant wind and solar resources indicates that the cost
of making the final schedules that emerge from their zonal
markets physically feasible is likely to get even larger as
the amount of intermittent renewable generation capacity
increases. According to the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity, in 2017 these costs
were more than €1 billion in Germany, more than €400 million in Great Britain, more than €80 million in Spain, and
approximately €50 million in Italy.

Multisettlement LMP Market
A multisettlement LMP market has at least a day-ahead forward market and a real-time market, each of which employs
the same market-clearing mechanism. The day-ahead market typically allows generation unit owners to submit threepart offers to supply energy: start-up costs, minimum load
costs, and an energy offer curve. These are used to compute
hourly generation schedules, ancillary service quantities,
and LMPs for energy and ancillary services for all 24 h of
the following day. A generation unit will not be accepted to
supply energy in the day-ahead market unless the combination of its offered start-up costs, minimum load costs, and
energy production costs are part of the least as-offered-cost
solution to serving the hourly locational demands for all
24 h of the following day.
The energy schedules that emerge from the day-ahead
market do not require a generation unit to produce the
energy sold or a load to consume the energy purchased in
january/february 2021

the day-ahead market at a given location. Any production
shortfall relative to a day-ahead generation schedule must
be purchased from the real-time market at that location.
Any production greater than a generation unit's day-ahead
schedule is sold at the real-time price at that location.
Any additional consumption beyond a load's day-ahead
energy schedule is paid for at the real-time price at that
location, and the surplus of a day-ahead schedule relative to actual consumption is sold at the real-time price at
that location.

Mitigating Local Market Power
The configuration of the transmission network, the level and
location of demand, and the level of output of other generation units can create system conditions in which almost any
generation unit or group of generation units has a significant
ability to exercise unilateral market power. The constrainedon generation problem is an example of this phenomenon.
The unit's owner knows that it must be accepted to supply energy regardless of its offer price. Without an LMPM
mechanism, there may be no limit to the offer price the unit
owner could submit and have accepted to supply energy.
During the first summer of the California market, when
there was no formal LMPM mechanism, suppliers submitted extremely high offers for energy and ancillary services
when these system conditions arose. This logic is why market power-mitigation mechanisms typically used in Europe
and other industrialized regions and initially employed in
the United States, which designate in advance the offers of
certain generation units for mitigation for an entire year,
miss many instances of the exercise of substantial unilateral
market power.
An automated LMPM mechanism built into the market
software that relies on actual system conditions to determine
whether any supplier has a substantial ability and incentive
to exercise unilateral market power is likely to be significantly more effective. This regulator-approved administrative procedure determines 1) when a supplier has an ability to exercise local market power worthy of mitigation, 2)
the value of the supplier's mitigated offer price, and 3) the
price the mitigated supplier is paid. It is increasingly clear
to regulators around the world, particularly those that operate markets with a finite amount of transmission capacity
and significant intermittent renewable generation capacity,
that an automatic LMPM mechanism is a necessary feature
of any short-term market design. Because these LMPM
mechanisms are built into the market software of all U.S.
ieee power & energy magazine

IEEE Power & Energy Magazine - January/February 2021

Table of Contents for the Digital Edition of IEEE Power & Energy Magazine - January/February 2021