Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 862
862
our null hypothesis that there would be no difference
between groups. Our results suggest that both the ISF and
PW fixation methods may have sufficient strength to resist
early postoperative protected weightbearing and active
ankle dorsiflexion. If supported by clinical experience, the
likely benefits of early rehabilitation compared with plaster
immobilization could include improved patient satisfaction,
less stiffness, reduced risk of VTE, and shorter duration of
chemical VTE prophylaxis.
Although early rehabilitation is feasible, it is not risk free.
The normal excursion of the TP muscle is only 1.75 cm,28
but even 4-mm elongation of the tendon is estimated to
cause dysfunction.14 For the purposes of the current study,
considering measurement error, we defined displacement of
more than 5 mm as failure. All 11 of the PW specimens survived 1000 cycles, with mean displacement of 2.9 mm.
Displacement of more than 5 mm occurred in only 1 specimen, measuring 8.9 mm after 1000 cycles. Given the short
excursion of the TP muscle, this amount of displacement is
probably undesirable. In comparison, 1 of 12 ISF specimens
failed prematurely, within 100 cycles. In the remaining 11
specimens, mean displacement was 2.4 mm and in all specimens was less than 4 mm. Displacement was observed to
occur earlier in the PW group. Mean displacement of 2 mm
had occurred by 300 cycles in the PW group but took 900
cycles to reach this threshold in the ISF group. We observed
greater variation in displacement in the PW group compared
with ISF (SD 2.5 and 1.1 mm, respectively). Screw fixation
may therefore be preferable over tendon-to-tendon repair as
it is more consistently reproducible.
Data on cyclical testing of tendon fixation in the foot are
limited, especially in comparison to the extensive literature
in the knee. The displacements we observed for TP tendon
transfer appear similar to that observed in some studies of
hamstring graft interference screw fixation for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL).22,27 For example, Kousa et al22 showed that cyclic loading of ACL
hamstring grafts fixed with a 7-mm RCI screw displaced
3.9 mm after 1500 cycles at 200 N. Micucci et al27 recorded
hamstring graft slippage in a 9-mm tunnel at 250 N for
1500 cycles, noting mean displacements of 2.65 mm with a
9-mm diameter interference screw and 7.83 mm with an
11-mm screw. However, another study of ACL graft fixation found a mean displacement of 0.7 to 1.3 mm among 5
hamstring tendon fixation methods after 1000 cycles from
70 to 200 N and mean ultimate strengths of 490 to 945 N.4
In theory, tendon transfer directly to bone is preferable.
The single failure we observed in the ISF group is similar
to rates observed in previous biomechanical studies.9,22 In
the foot, for example, Drakos et al9 reported early failure in
3 of 10 specimens following ISF (5.5-mm diameter biotenodesis screw) for flexor hallucis longus (FHL) transfer
to the calcaneus, at 60 N loads. Simulating ACL reconstruction, Kousa et al22 observed that 1 of 10 specimens
failed early.
Foot & Ankle International 39(7)
The physiological force required for active dorsiflexion
is unclear. Although in an unloaded foot model, 50 N tension was required to achieve maximum dorsiflexion,17 modern estimates based on muscle cross-sectional area suggest
that greater physiological forces are encountered.6,7,20,37
During normal gait, Delp and Zajac7 estimated that the tibialis anterior and tibialis posterior muscles generate peak
forces of 600 N and 1270 N, respectively. Even with an
anticipated loss of 1 grade of strength following anterior
transfer of the TP, it is likely that more than 50 N tension
would occur at the fixation point.6,7,17,20 We therefore chose
to cyclically load the tendon at 150 N to simulate likely
physiological forces encountered during protected partial
weightbearing with the ankle immobilized in a boot and
also nonweightbearing active ankle dorsiflexion.
Both techniques demonstrated similarly high load-tofailure tests. In all specimens, the PW consistently failed at
the tendon-suture interface. In the ISF group, all specimens
failed at the tendon-screw interface, similar to biomechanical studies assessing flexor digitorum longus (FDL) and
flexor hallucis longus (FHL) tendon transfers.9,24 In the current study, the screw was placed inferior to the tendon
within the pilot hole. Upon loading, due to the direction of
tendon pull, the superior edge of the pilot hole was loaded,
fracturing in some cases (Figures 5-7). In future studies, it
may be useful to assess whether proximal placement of the
screw relative to the tendon would increase pullout strength.
In vivo management of an early tendon transfer failure
would pose particular difficulties for both techniques. For
the PW technique, after load-to-failure testing, the peroneus
brevis tendon consistently sustained damage due to the
sutures tearing out, which would make it hard to resuture
the TP tendon using the original technique. A side-to-side
tendon repair would be more feasible as a revision procedure or alternatively using a different transfer site. Failure
following the ISF method might be even more difficult to
revise. We consistently noted tunnel deformity or small
fractures through part of the tunnel wall. Furthermore, the
tendon lying within the pilot hole flattened due to compression by the screw. Overreaming to a larger pilot hole and
use of a larger diameter interference screw might be possible if the navicular had sufficient bone stock. If the pilot
hole deformity was too severe to revise, a different transfer
site would be required.
Interference screw fixation in the foot has gained popularity for several conditions.12 Screw fixation might be preferable to a tendon-to-tendon repair as it is less dependent
upon surgeon technique. The load-to-failure forces we report
are greater than for other tendon transfers in the foot. In 1
study, split anterior tibialis tendon transfer to the cuboid
using an 8-mm biotenodesis screw had a mean load to failure of 150 N.29 Sabonghy et al33 reported that FDL transfer
to the navicular using a 7-mm × 20-mm interference screw
with a 6.4-mm diameter pilot hole failed at a mean of 148 N.
Louden et al24 performed a similar study using FDL and
Table of Contents for the Digital Edition of Foot & Ankle International - July 2018
Contents
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - Intro
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - Cover1
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - Cover2
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - i
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - ii
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - Contents
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - iv
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - v
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - vi
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - vii
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - viii
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 1A
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 1B
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - ix
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - x
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - xi
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - xii
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 2A
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 2B
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - xiii
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - xiv
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - xv
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - xvi
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - xvii
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - xviii
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - xix
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - xx
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - xxi
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - xxii
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - xxiii
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - xxiv
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - xxv
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - xxvi
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 3A
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 3B
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 763
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 764
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 765
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 766
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 767
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 768
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 769
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 770
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 771
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 772
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 773
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 774
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 775
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 776
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 777
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 778
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 779
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 780
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 781
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 782
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 783
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 784
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 785
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 786
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 787
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 788
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 789
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 790
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 791
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 792
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 793
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 794
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 795
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 796
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 797
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 798
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 799
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 800
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 801
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 802
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 803
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 804
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 805
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 806
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 807
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 808
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 809
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 810
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 811
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 812
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 813
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 814
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 815
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 816
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 817
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 818
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 819
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 820
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 821
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 822
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 823
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 824
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 825
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 826
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 827
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 828
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 829
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 830
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 831
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 832
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 833
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 834
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 835
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 836
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 837
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 838
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 839
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 840
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 841
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 842
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 843
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 844
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 845
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 846
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 847
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 848
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 849
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 850
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 851
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 852
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 853
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 854
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 855
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 856
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 857
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 858
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 859
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 860
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 861
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 862
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 863
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 864
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 865
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 866
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 867
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 868
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 869
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 870
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 871
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 872
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 873
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 874
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 875
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 876
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 877
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 878
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 879
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 880
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 881
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 882
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 883
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - 884
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - Cover3
Foot & Ankle International - July 2018 - Cover4
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_december2020
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/psychologicalscience_demo
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_october2020
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/fai_202009
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_august2020
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_june2020
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_april2020
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_february2020
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_december2019
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_october2019
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/fai_201909
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_july2019
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_june2019
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/canadianpharmacistsjournal_05062019
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_april2019
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/sri_supplement_201903
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_february2019
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_december2018
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/tec_20180810
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_october2018
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_julyaugust2018
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/fai_201807
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_june2018
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_april2018
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/sri_supplement_201803
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/slas_discovery_201712
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_february2018
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_december2017
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_november2017
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_october2017
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_september2017
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_julyaugust2017
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/fai_supplement_201709
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_june2017
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_may2017
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/fai_201706
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/fai_201607
https://www.nxtbookmedia.com