Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 138
138
assessments. Injection-site reactions would potentially be
much higher with adjuvant versus saline 0.9% solution.
The follow-up period has only been 3.5 years, so the longterm durability of these results remains to be proven.
Reference: Cunningham AL, et al, 2016 (ZOE-70 trial)9
Study Design: Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, international, multicenter, placebo-controlled study, and
pooled analysis (ZOE-50 and ZOE-70)
Study Funding: GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals
Patients: 13 900 adults 70 years and older; the pooled
data set (ZOE-50 and ZOE-70) consisted of 16 596 evaluable adults 70 years and older. Exclusion criteria included
history of herpes zoster, previous vaccination against varicella or herpes zoster, an immunosuppressive condition,
or chronic use of immunosuppressants or other immunemodifying drugs within 6 months prior to the first vaccine
dose (prednisone less than 20 mg/day or equivalent was
allowed). In ZOE-70, the majority of participants were
from Europe (54%) and white (76.9%) and female
(54.9%). Mean age was 75.6 years; 22.1% were 80 years
and older.
Intervention: Subjects were randomized (1:1) to receive
intramuscular injections of Shingrix 0.5 mL or placebo
(saline 0.9% solution) at month 0 and month 2; subjects
were stratified according to region and age (70-79 years
vs 80 years and older). Participants were to be followed
for at least 30 months after the second dose through
monthly contacts and annual clinic visits.
Results
Primary End Point(s)
** The incidence rate of herpes zoster per 1000 personyears was 0.9 in the Shingrix group and 9.2 in the placebo group, corresponding to an overall vaccine
efficacy of 89.8% (95% CI, 84.2%-93.7%; P < .001).
Vaccine efficacy did not differ between age groups
(90% for 70-79 years and 89.1% for 80 years and
older).
** Pooled analysis from ZOE-50 and ZOE-70 subjects
70 years of age and older showed a vaccine efficacy of
91.3% (95% CI, 86.8%-94.5%; P < .001). Vaccine
efficacy did not differ between age groups (91.3% for
70-79 years, and 91.4% for 80 years and older).
Secondary End Point(s)
** Incidence rate of postherpetic neuralgia per 1000 person-years in a pooled analysis of all eligible participants enrolled in ZOE-50 and ZOE-70 (50 years and
older) was 0.1 in the Shingrix group and 0.9 in the
placebo group, resulting in a vaccine efficacy of
91.2% (95% CI, 75.9%-97.7%; P < .001). No subjects
younger than 70 years vaccinated with Shingrix developed postherpetic neuralgia. In the pooled analysis of
Hospital Pharmacy 53(3)
subjects 70 years and older (N = 16 596), vaccine efficacy against postherpetic neuralgia was 88.8% (95%
CI, 68.7%-97.1%; P < .001).
** During the mean follow-up period of 4 years in ZOE70, overall rates of serious adverse effects were similar between groups (16.6% with Shingrix vs 17.5%
with placebo). Solicited reports of reactions within 7
days after vaccination were noted in 79% of the
Shingrix group compared with 29.5% of the placebo
group. Grade 3 injection-site solicited reactions were
reported in 8.5% of the Shingrix group and in 0.2% of
the placebo group. In those receiving Shingrix, pain
was the most commonly reported injection-site reaction (68.7%), and fatigue was the most commonly
reported systemic reaction (32.9%). Most adverse
reactions were transient, and the median duration was
2 to 3 days for injection-site reactions, 1 to 2 days for
systemic reactions, and 1 to 2 days for grade 3
reactions.
Comments: The study was conducted in 18 countries in
Europe, North America, Latin America, and AsiaAustralia. The study design was the same as that of ZOE50, and this study was conducted concurrently at the same
sites so that data from the 2 studies could be pooled. The
only difference was that ZOE-70 consisted only of subjects 70 years and older, resulting in different age group
stratification.
Limitations: The long-term durability of vaccine
response cannot be determined with an average follow-up
period of 4 years.
Contraindications, Warnings, and
Precautions
Contraindications
Shingrix vaccine should not be administered to individuals
with a history of severe allergic reaction to a previous dose of
Shingrix or to any component of the vaccine. Reconstituted
Shingrix vaccine contains recombinant VZV glycoprotein E
antigen, sucrose, polysorbate 80, sodium dihydrogen phosphate dehydrate, dipotassium phosphate, QS-21, MPL, liposomes (dioleoyl phosphatidylcholine [DOPC] and
cholesterol), phosphate-buffered solution, disodium phosphate anhydrous, potassium dihydrogen phosphate, sodium
chloride, and water for injection.1
Warnings and Precautions
Prior to vaccination with Shingrix, patient immunization
history should be reviewed for any vaccine sensitivity and
previous vaccination-related adverse reactions to mitigate
any potential anaphylactic reactions following Shingrix
administration.1
Table of Contents for the Digital Edition of Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018
Ed Board
TOC
USP <800>
Oct-Dec 2017 Boxed Warning Highlights approved by the FDA
Zoster Vaccine Recombinant, Adjuvanted
Multifactorial Causes of Tacrolimus Errors: Confusion With Strength/Formulation, Look-Alike Names, Preparation Errors, and More
New Medications in the Treatment of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis
One Chance for Your Best First Impression: Tips for New Pharmacists
Implications of Statin Use on Vasopressor Therapy in the Setting of Septic Shock
Intravenous Push Administration of Antibiotics: Literature and Considerations
The Role of Computerized Clinical Decision Support in Reducing Inappropriate Medication Administration During Epidural Therapy
Health Care Professionals Toward Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting in Hiwot Fana Specialized University Hospital, Harar, Eastern Ethiopia: A Cross-sectional Study
Nonpharmacist Health Care Providers’ Knowledge of and Opinions Regarding Medication Costs in Critically Ill Patients
Detection of HBV, HCV, and Incidence of Febrile Neutropenia Associated With CHOP With or Without Rituximab in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma–Treated Patients
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - Cover1
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - Cover2
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - Ed Board
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - TOC
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 131
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - USP <800>
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 133
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - Oct-Dec 2017 Boxed Warning Highlights approved by the FDA
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 135
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - Zoster Vaccine Recombinant, Adjuvanted
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 137
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 138
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 139
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 140
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 141
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - Multifactorial Causes of Tacrolimus Errors: Confusion With Strength/Formulation, Look-Alike Names, Preparation Errors, and More
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 143
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 144
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 145
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - New Medications in the Treatment of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 147
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - One Chance for Your Best First Impression: Tips for New Pharmacists
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 149
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 150
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 151
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - Implications of Statin Use on Vasopressor Therapy in the Setting of Septic Shock
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 153
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 154
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 155
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 156
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - Intravenous Push Administration of Antibiotics: Literature and Considerations
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 158
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 159
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 160
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 161
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 162
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 163
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 164
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 165
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 166
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 167
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 168
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 169
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - The Role of Computerized Clinical Decision Support in Reducing Inappropriate Medication Administration During Epidural Therapy
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 171
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 172
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 173
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 174
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 175
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 176
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - Health Care Professionals Toward Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting in Hiwot Fana Specialized University Hospital, Harar, Eastern Ethiopia: A Cross-sectional Study
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 178
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 179
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 180
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 181
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 182
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 183
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 184
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 185
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 186
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 187
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - Nonpharmacist Health Care Providers’ Knowledge of and Opinions Regarding Medication Costs in Critically Ill Patients
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 189
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 190
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 191
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 192
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 193
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - Detection of HBV, HCV, and Incidence of Febrile Neutropenia Associated With CHOP With or Without Rituximab in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma–Treated Patients
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 195
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 196
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 197
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 198
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 199
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - 200
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - Cover3
Hospital Pharmacy - June 2018 - Cover4
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_december2020
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/psychologicalscience_demo
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_october2020
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/fai_202009
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_august2020
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_june2020
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_april2020
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_february2020
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_december2019
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_october2019
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/fai_201909
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_july2019
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_june2019
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/canadianpharmacistsjournal_05062019
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_april2019
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/sri_supplement_201903
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_february2019
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_december2018
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/tec_20180810
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_october2018
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_julyaugust2018
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/fai_201807
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_june2018
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_april2018
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/sri_supplement_201803
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/slas_discovery_201712
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_february2018
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_december2017
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_november2017
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_october2017
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_september2017
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_julyaugust2017
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/fai_supplement_201709
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_june2017
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/hospitalpharmacy_may2017
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/fai_201706
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sage/fai_201607
https://www.nxtbookmedia.com