Remote - Spring 2015 - (Page 14)
Feature Article
Wireless Well Pad Retrofit
Jim Gardner, Regional Vice President
OleumTech, Inc.
Automation has been a standard in the oil and gas industry for many
years. Just in the past 10 years alone, wireless automation has taken over
a very large percentage of all new installations. Many companies consider
automation as a part of the check list for any new wells that are drilled.
However, retrofitting older wells has been a slower evolution, but with
the advances in wireless technology, the economic case for retrofitting has
caused some operators to see it as a viable business decision. As with any
business decision, multiple factors have to be considered. Those who have
chosen to retrofit older wells with wireless automation typically site these
eight reasons as their main justification.
1. Reduced downtime
2. Increased safety at production locations
3. Reduction in lightning damage
4. Reduced maintenance costs
5. Additional flexibility
6. Ease in troubleshooting
7. Ability to install without interrupting production operations
8. Regulatory compliance and Emergency shutdown capability
Safety
Safety is always a primary concern in oil and gas operations. One of the
most common areas for injury is slip and fall accidents on production locations. Another major concern is exposure to hazardous environments and
hazardous gases. Automation of tank gauging and other process variables
such as casing pressure, tubing pressure and flow volumes can reduce the
number of trips to production locations. And even when personnel are on
location, process variables like tank level can be read through a HMI LCD
Display from a central location without climbing the stairs and opening a
hatch. Wireless automation adds to safety by greatly reducing installation
time and eliminating the need for open trenches and heavy equipment to be
on location. A wired installation often requires a team of people working for
several days on location to accomplish what one man can do in hours using
wireless instrumentation. Simply reducing man hours on a project also
helps reduce risk of injury. Eliminating the need for back hoes and man lifts
on location further reduces the potential for risk.
Economics
There are two factors in economic decisions:
* Will it increase production? (increase revenue)
* Will it reduce expenses? (increase profits)
Automation has a long track record of proving that it can do both of
these things effectively.
How Automation Increases Oil Production and
Reduces Expenses
Optimizing gas well production is at the heart of automation. As one major
gas producer was quoted as saying, "there are only two kinds of gas wells,
those that are on plunger lift and those that will be on plunger lift." New
breakthroughs in technology allow operators to implement Class 1, Division 1
wireless instrumentation on to a wellhead. The best of these devices are both
explosion-proof and intrinsically safe. The explosion-proof housings make
the products extremely durable and "oilfield tough," while the intrinsically
safe feature allows technicians and operators to change batteries and calibrate
the instrument in place without the fear of creating an electrical spark that can
cause a fire accident. Today, manufacturers of wireless instruments offer casing pressure, tubing pressure, flow meter, plunger arrival, and valve control
signals from the wellhead or tank battery back to a local Remote Controller,
which is located outside the classified area. This can be extremely effective
when communication to a central tank battery is desired or if there are multiple wellheads on one location talking to a central controller.
14
www.RemoteMagazine.com
How Automation Increases Gas Production and
Reduces Expenses
In oil production, the
emphasis switches from gas
measurement with some liquid
byproduct to large volumes of
liquids and some gas byproduct.
With multiple tanks, separators,
turbine meters and valves, wireless automation allows operators
to bring data from many different
Hardwired
locations into a central location
easily as seen in the figure below.
The wireless option reduces installation expense by 30 to 40 percent and
cuts deployment time from multiple days to just a few hours. Also, if a
particular wireless system provides scalability or expansion of end nodes,
adding more points or end nodes to a system at a later time is quite easy to
do without the burden of permitting, trenching and running wires.
Downtime-Alarms-ESD Systems
One of the most attractive features of a wireless
retrofit is the flexibility
of products. If there is an
existing wired system in
place, the operator can
choose to add new points
wirelessly and leave the
existing instrumentation
in place by disconnecting the wire from the
instrument and adding a
Wireless
wireless transmitter. They
can also add new points to
the system wirelessly that are capable of communicating to the same data
hub in the controller that is already in service. One of the advantages of a
wireless system is its ability to be added at any time to a production location and expand on what may already be in place or retrofit to the existing
system. Wireless systems provide the ability to send alarms for any process
variable, and can provide alarms for the wireless system itself. In addition, many wireless systems provide alarms for poor radio reception, weak
battery, and communication failures. Facility alarms for high tank level,
high flow, low flow, high pressure and low pressure are often brought back
to the controller to allow the controller to make logic decisions and affect
emergency shutdown (ESD). However, some operators choose to have the
http://www.RemoteMagazine.com
Table of Contents for the Digital Edition of Remote - Spring 2015
Editor's Choice
The Impact of OPC UA and Information Modeling on Monitoring Solutions
Protecting Critical Infrastructure: Understanding the Threat to SCADA Networks
Small Power, Big Benefits – Fuel Cells for Remote and Off-Grid Applications
What to Expect in the Equipment Industry in 2015
Wireless Well Pad Retrofit
IT-OT Convergence: The Importance of Aligning Historically Disparate Technologies
Internet of Things North Americs Preview
SCADA
Networking
Security
Onsite Power
Industry News
Remote - Spring 2015
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/webcom/remote_2016winter
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/webcom/remote_2016fall
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/webcom/remote_2016
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/webcom/remote_2016spring
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/webcom/remote_2015fall
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/webcom/remote_2015m2m
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/webcom/remote_2015spring
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/webcom/remote_industrialnetworking2014
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/webcom/remote_2014fall
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/webcom/remote_2014m2m
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/webcom/remote_2014spring
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/webcom/remote_2013winter
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/webcom/remote_2013m2m
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/webcom/remote_2013fall
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/webcom/remote_2013summer
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/webcom/remote_2013spring
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/webcom/remote_2012winter
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/webcom/remote_2012m2m
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/webcom/remote_2012fall
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/webcom/remote_2012summer
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/webcom/remote_2012scada
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/webcom/remote_2012spring
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/webcom/remote_201112
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/webcom/remote_201110
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/webcom/remote_201108
https://www.nxtbookmedia.com